Foundation Studies Advanced Academic English 预科 代写

  • 100%原创包过,高质代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信:120591129
  • Foundation Studies Advanced Academic English 代写

    Revised 28 April 2017
    Foundation Studies
    Advanced Academic English
    Assessment Task Notification - Essay
    Student ID  Last name  First name  Preferred name
    Topic Title  Essay
    Due Date  Week 11 Friday 12 May by 5pm, submitted online to Turnitin
    Weighting  20%
    Length  1000 – 1200 words (+/- 10%)
    Instructions  You are required to write a scholarly essay on one of the topics provided below. Your essay should have 1000 – 1200 words and be original
    research developed to respond to the essay question. This means that repeating and recycling materials, arguments and research from previous
    assessments, as well as other courses and their assessments is not permitted.
    Your essay should include the following elements:
      Include a title for your essay (your chosen question).
      Include your name and student number in the document header, and page numbers in the footer.
      Use font size 12 and 1.5 line spacing.
      Use APA referencing style.
      Incorporate an introduction, discussion paragraphs and conclusion.
      Reference at least four resources (three scholarly sources related to your chosen topic and Marchetta’s Looking for Alibrandi)
      Include a list of works cited at the end of your essay. Remember that references cited in the essay need to correspond to the list of
    works cited at the end.
      Bear in mind academic honesty principles, preventing plagiarism and attributing resources to their authors.
    Method of submission: Please submit your essay to Turnitin by Friday 12 May by 5pm. Your essay must be written and submitted in Word
    format – no other formats are acceptable.
    Revised 28 April 2017
    Essay questions: Choose one topic from the list provided and read the instructions carefully. You are strongly encouraged to discuss your essay
    topic and essay plan with your teacher before submitting the final version to Turnitin.
    1. AUSTRALIAN MULTICULTURALISM
    1. Stereotyping can either motivate an individual to succeed or discourage them from achieving their goals.
    Discuss the above statement and the impact of stereotyping on an individual. In your essay, make direct reference to Melina Marchetta’s 1992
    novel, Looking for Alibrandi, and at least THREE scholarly sources.
    2. ETHICS
    2. “Educating the mind without educating the heart is no education at all.” ― Aristotle
    What role does education play in shaping one’s ethical principles? Discuss this issue in relation to Aristotle’s statement. In your essay, make
    direct reference to Melina Marchetta’s 1992 novel, Looking for Alibrandi, and at least THREE scholarly sources.
    3. IDENTITY
    3. Culture and gender are inextricably linked to our identity.
    Do you agree? Argue in relation to the role of culture and gender in forming our individual identity. In your essay, make direct reference to
    Melina Marchetta’s 1992 novel, Looking for Alibrandi, and at least THREE scholarly sources.
    4. GENDER
    4. The changing nature of gender expectations on individuals can be liberating or limiting for young Australians.
    Analyse the above statement and explore the evolution of gender expectations in Australia and its impact on individuals. In your essay, make
    direct reference to Melina Marchetta’s 1992 novel, Looking for Alibrandi, and at least THREE scholarly sources.
    5. CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION
    T he challenge of cross-cultural communication is exacerbated by generational differences.
    Evaluate this notion in statement in relation to contemporary Australia and your own cultural background. In your essay, make direct reference
    to Melina Marchetta’s 1992 novel, Looking for Alibrandi, and at least THREE scholarly sources.
    Revised 28 April 2017
    Essay (20%)
    Criteria  Fail Pass  Credit  Distinction  High Distinction
    Argument
    0 1 2 3 4  5  6  7  8 9 10
    Student’s argument lacks
    coherence and
    consistency. It is difficult
    to follow and fragmented.
    Student provides sufficient
    arguments which are
    adequately presented. Ideas
    may occasionally lack
    coherence and direction, and
    appear derivative in nature.
    Student provides
    coherent and sound
    arguments which are
    well-presented. Ideas
    may occasionally lack
    consistency and
    direction.
    Student provides
    compelling, persuasive
    and sound arguments
    which are well-
    presented, clear and
    coherent.
    Student provides highly
    original, persuasive, detailed
    and compelling arguments
    which are excellently
    presented.
    Evidence
    0 1 2 3 4  5  6  7  8 9 10
    Student uses limited or no
    specific examples to
    support arguments.
    Student uses adequate
    examples from scholarly
    sources and core text to
    support arguments. Some
    resources and examples may
    be missing, lacking relevance
    and coherence.
    Student uses well-
    presented and
    compelling examples
    from scholarly sources
    and the core text to
    support arguments.
    Some resources and
    examples may lack
    relevance and coherence.
    Student uses well-
    presented and
    compelling examples
    from scholarly sources
    and the core text to
    support arguments and,
    competently integrates
    them into the essay.
    Student uses well-presented
    and diverse examples from
    scholarly sources and the
    core text to support
    arguments and fluently
    integrates them into the
    essay.
    Structure
    0 1 2 3 4  5  6  7  8 9 10
    Student’s essay is
    incoherent, and has no
    sense of planning,
    structuring or direction. It
    lacks identifiable sections
    such as an introduction,
    discussion and conclusion.
    Student’s essay has some
    evidence of structuring,
    planning and distinct
    sections incorporating an
    introduction, discussion and
    conclusion. The paragraphs
    may appear fragmented with
    abrupt thematic shifts and
    inconsistent use transitional
    phrases.
    Student’s essay reflects
    solid structuring,
    planning and distinct
    sections incorporating an
    introduction, discussion
    and conclusion. There is
    an attempt at linking
    paragraphs with topical
    sentences and
    transitional phrases.
    Student’s essay reflects
    careful structuring,
    planning and distinct
    sections incorporating
    an introduction,
    discussion and
    conclusion. The
    paragraphs are well-
    linked with topical
    sentences and
    transitional phrases.
    Student’s essay is well-
    structured, carefully planned
    and excellently presented,
    incorporating an
    introduction, discussion and
    conclusion. The paragraphs
    are excellently linked with
    topical sentences and
    transitional phrases.
    Revised 28 April 2017
    Criteria Fail  Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction
    Language
    0 1 2 3 4  5  6  7  8 9 10
    Numerous issues with
    style, register, spelling,
    grammar, and
    punctuation make it
    difficult to understand.
    Student uses
    comprehensible language
    although there may be
    issues in the areas of style,
    register, spelling, grammar
    and punctuation.
    Student uses correct and
    clear language with
    occasional issues in some
    areas of style, register,
    spelling, grammar and
    punctuation.
    Student uses precise
    and clear language;
    demonstrating good
    control over style,
    register, spelling,
    grammar and
    punctuation. There may
    be minor errors present.
    Student demonstrates
    excellent control over
    language and vocabulary,
    correct spelling, grammar
    and punctuation. Writing is
    compelling and eloquent.
    Referencing
    0 1 2 3 4  5  6  7  8 9 10
    There is little evidence of
    sources consulted. No
    references or incomplete
    references used to
    support points.
    Adequate citation of texts
    with occasional errors and
    missing elements. Citation

    Foundation Studies Advanced Academic English 预科 代写
    reflects sufficient
    understanding of referencing
    rules and their application.
    Solid citation of texts
    with occasional errors
    and inconsistencies.
    Citation reflects a good
    understanding of
    referencing rules and
    their application.
    Excellent citation of
    texts with possible
    minor errors. Citation
    reflects a strong
    understanding of
    referencing rules and
    their application.
    Citation of sources is
    excellently presented and
    follows referencing rules
    with consistency.
    Comments:
    Foundation Studies Advanced Academic English 预科 代写