悉尼管理学assignment代写:管理者的人际角色

  • 100%原创包过,高质代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信:120591129
  • 悉尼管理学assignment代写:管理者的人际角色

    多年来,人们普遍认为经理的角色就像管弦乐队的领导者一样,控制着组织的整体表现。当涉及到不同层次的管理者的工作,值得注意的是,管理者的工作是非常复杂的,具有简洁性负担过重,安排和口头沟通(明茨伯格2000)。具体而言,管理者的职责分为十个角色(明茨伯格1989)。分别的十个角色的领袖,领导者,联络、监控、传播者、代言人、企业家、混乱处理者,资源分配和谈判代表(明茨伯格1973)。具体来说,前三个角色被进一步划分为人际角色(明茨伯格1973)。本文主要对经理人员的人际角色进行分析。虽然大多数分析集中于明茨伯格的理论和研究,但其他理论和文章也被引用。
    2经理的人际角色介绍
    第一是以明茨伯格为领袖的作用。作为“傀儡”的意味,管理者作为一个人的权威和激励组织内。在自然界中,傀儡的角色是象征性的礼仪,执行许多常规的社会责任和法律责任。现实中的例子是,当一个大学的校长拿毕业证书,当销售经理陪一个重要的顾客吃午饭,或者当工厂的主管为高中学生提供参观工厂时(明茨伯格1989)。
    第二个,领导者的角色,是最广为人知和清晰可见的。当经理负责一个组织单位时,他负责团队中员工的表现。具体来说,领导角色包括雇佣、激励和约束员工等任务。此外,在这一角色中,实现集团的增长和避免冲突的必要性使管理者肩负起重担。研究表明,成功的管理者进行冲突管理相关的多个行为(Luthans Rosencrantz &亨尼西1985)。
    与领导角色相比,第三个角色的认同感不太明显。正如明茨伯格所描述的,经理的联络作用是致力于建立和维护经理自己的外部信息系统,该系统是私人的、非正式的、口头的,但却是有效的(明茨伯格2000)。详细地说,它与通信有关。这个角色需要经理不仅要向上级汇报工作,与其他单位的同行,与外界verdors和客户及其他活动。
    另外,从其他理论角度分析人际角色也是值得的。在这里,亨利·法约尔的理论被引用。五管理功能,在Fayol的理论中认为:计划、组织、指挥、协调和控制。在Lamond的分析中,值得注意的是,所有的管理者的人际角色重叠的三个部分,不同程度,与五功能描述Fayol(拉蒙德2003)。考虑到Fayols的重点是什么,管理者应该在理想状态(拉蒙2003),可以推断,管理者的人际角色至关重要,如果管理者实现有效的绩效。

    悉尼管理学assignment代写:管理者的人际角色

    For years, it is accepted that the roles of manager are like orchestra leaders, controlling the overall performance of the organization. When it comes to the work of managers of different levels, it is noted that the jobs of managers are extremely complicated and overburdened with tacks characterized with concision, arrangement and verbal communication (Mintzberg 2000). In detail, the obligations of managers are categorized into ten roles (Mintzberg 1989). Respectively, the ten roles are figurehead, leader, liaison, monitor, disseminator, spokesperson, entrepreneur, disturbance handler, resource allocator and negotiator (Mintzberg 1973). Specifically, the first three roles are further categorized as the interpersonal roles (Mintzberg 1973). This essay will mainly focus on the analysis of the interpersonal roles of managers. While most analysis focuses on the theory and research by Mintzberg, other theories and articles are also cited.
    2.0 Introduction of the interpersonal roles of managers
    The first is named by Mintzberg as the figurehead role. As the word “figurehead” imply, managers are looked as a person with authority and inspiration within the organization. In nature, the role of figurehead is symbolic and ceremonial, performing numerous routine social and legal responsibilities. Examples in reality are when the president of a university hands out diploma, when the sales manager accompanies an important customer to lunch or when supervisor of a factory offers high school students a visit of the plant (Mintzberg 1989). 
    The second one, the leader role, is most commonly known and clearly seen. As the manager is in charge of one organizational unit, he is responsible for the performance of employees in the team. Specifically, the leader role includes tasks like hiring, motivating and disciplining employees. Moreover, in this role, the necessity to realize grow and avoid conflict in the group put the burden on the shoulders of managers. Study showed that successful managers performed more behaviors related to conflict management (Luthans Rosencrantz & Hennessey 1985).
    Comparing with the role of leader, the third one-the liaison role is less recognized. As is described by Mintzberg, the liaison role of managers is dedicated to establish and maintain the manager’s own external information system, which is private, informal, verbal, but effective (Mintzberg 2000). In detail, it is related to communication. This role requires manager not only to report to upper management, peers from other units, and verdors and clients and other activities involving outsiders. 
    In addition, it is worthy to analyze the interpersonal role from other theory. Here the theory of Henri Fayol is quoted. Five management functions are recognized in Fayol’s theory: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. In Lamond’s analysis, it is worthy to notice that all of the three parts of the interpersonal role of managers overlap, to various extent, with the five functions described by Fayol (Lamond 2003). Considering the fact that Fayols focus on what managers should do in idealized states (Lamond 2003), it could be deduced that the interpersonal roles of managers are significant importance if the managers are to realize effective performance.